All articlesScheduling9

Tailwind Alternatives: Three Options With Prices, and How to Switch Without Losing Your Queue

Three alternatives for somebody leaving Tailwind or another paid scheduler, listed alphabetically with their features and list prices, and the switching order that stops you losing a month of work.

Tailwind Alternatives: Three Options With Prices, and How to Switch Without Losing Your Queue
🗓️ Scheduling
Tailwind Alternatives: Three Options With Prices, and How to Switch Without Losing Your Queue
PinPinterest

Tailwind’s plans bundle a queue with extras such as communities, a design tool and a browser extension (as its own pages list them).

This post is for somebody who only uses the queue.

If the queue is the only part of a bundled scheduler you use, you may be paying for features you never open.

So this post is that check.

The bill outgrew the use
You are paying a per-post price that made sense at triple the volume you now publish.
You only ever use the queue
Communities, insights and the browser extension go untouched month after month.
One channel, one tool
You stopped posting anywhere else, so the multi-network premium buys you nothing.
None of these mean the tool is bad. They mean it stopped matching your week.
Three reasons people look elsewhere.

The three reasons people actually leave

1. The bill outgrew the usage

This is by far the most common one, and it is almost always a drift rather than a decision.

You signed up when you were publishing thirty pins a week and the price felt like nothing.

Two years later you publish twelve, the price has not moved, and nobody ever went back and did the sum.

The number to work out is not the monthly price.

It is what one published pin costs you.

Divide the monthly fee by the pins you genuinely published last month — not planned, published — and you will get a number that either makes you shrug or makes you sit up.

2. You only ever open one screen

Bundled tools are priced on the assumption you use the bundle.

If you have never touched the design tool, never joined a community, never installed the extension, then you are subsidising features for people who do.

There is no shame in that.

It is just a mismatch, and mismatches are worth fixing once a year.

3. Pinterest became your only channel

Plenty of people arrive at Pinterest through a general "I should be on social media" phase, sign up for something that does five networks, and then quietly discover that Pinterest is the only one that sends them traffic.

At that point the multi-network premium is buying you nothing at all.

The one bad reason to switch

Do not switch because your reach dropped. Schedulers do not cause reach problems — the algorithm does not know or care which tool published a pin. Moving tools to fix a traffic dip means paying a migration cost to change nothing, and then still having the traffic dip.

What to switch to

Compared specifically for somebody leaving a paid scheduler, which is a narrower question than "best tool overall", and listed alphabetically.

You already know you want a queue; you are optimising for keeping it while paying less.

Later
A visual calendar; schedules to Pinterest and other networks.
Metricool
Scheduling plus reports across networks; a free plan.
Pinterest’s own scheduler
Free; up to 30 days ahead, one pin at a time.
Alphabetical, for somebody leaving a paid scheduler.
Three options for a switcher, alphabetically, with what each one does.

Later

Later auto-publishes to Pinterest, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, Threads, YouTube, LinkedIn and Snapchat, and lays the plan out on a content calendar with Quick Schedule, a weekly recurring queue of time slots.

It has no free plan but a 14-day free trial, and Starter lists at $18.75 a month billed yearly, as read in October 2026.

Metricool

Metricool schedules and auto-publishes to Pinterest and other networks, reports on the results across them, and takes posts by CSV import or in Autolists that publish on a schedule you choose.

Its free plan covers 1 brand and 20 posts a month, Pinterest included, and Starter lists at $20 a month billed yearly ($25 monthly), as read in October 2026.

Pinterest’s own scheduler

Pinterest has a built-in scheduler, and it is free.

It reaches at most 30 days ahead, holds ten pins waiting at a time and takes them one at a time, so it falls apart at volume.

But if the audit above showed you publishing eight pins a month, the correct alternative to a paid scheduler is no paid scheduler.

I have written up exactly where the native one runs out so you can judge it against your own numbers rather than mine.

The whole job is one hour of admin. Doing it in the wrong order is what costs people a month.
The whole job is one hour of admin. Doing it in the wrong order is what costs people a month.

How to leave without losing anything

Right, this is the part I actually care about, because I have watched two different people lose a fortnight of queued pins by doing it in the wrong order.

Here is the sequence.

It is not fussy, and every step exists because skipping it has burned somebody.

1
Screenshot the slots
your posting times are data too
2
Export the queue
while the account still works
3
Rebuild the boards
in the new tool, same order
4
Run both 7 days
cheap insurance, one billing cycle
5
Then cancel
not before pin one publishes
Overlap one billing cycle. It is the cheapest insurance in this whole post.

Screenshot your posting slots before anything else

Your time slots are data, and they are the one thing that never exports.

If you have spent a year refining which times work for you, capture that as an image before you touch anything — it takes ten seconds and it is unrecoverable afterwards.

Export the queue while the account still works

Obvious in hindsight, routinely forgotten.

A cancelled account often loses access immediately rather than at the end of the period, and everything you had scheduled goes with it.

Export first, always.

Rebuild your boards deliberately

Board names rarely map cleanly between tools, and a mis-mapped board sends a pin somewhere sensible-looking but wrong.

Do this bit slowly and check each one — it is the step where silent errors hide.

Run both for a week

Pay for one extra week of the old tool.

Yes, really.

You are buying the ability to discover a problem while the old system still works, which is worth vastly more than the week costs.

During that week, publish through the new tool and let the old queue drain.

Do not queue new things in both — that is how you get duplicates going out, which is one of the silent scheduling mistakes that quietly costs reach.

Watch the first pin land with your own eyes

Open Pinterest — not the scheduler’s dashboard, Pinterest — and confirm the pin is there, on the right board, with the right link.

A tool that thinks it published something and a pin that actually exists are two different claims, and only one of them matters.

Only after that do you cancel.

What to check on the new tool in the first fortnight

A short list, because the failures are boringly consistent.

  1. Did every scheduled pin actually publish? Failures are silent in most tools.
  2. Are the links right? Board mapping errors show up as pins pointing at the wrong page.
  3. Are your times what you set, or the tool’s defaults? Defaults are never your slots.
  4. Is anything going out twice? The classic symptom of running two queues in parallel.
  5. Does the queue have more than a week of depth? If not, you have a gap coming.

Do that check twice in the first two weeks and then monthly.

It takes about four minutes and it catches the entire class of problem where a tool has silently stopped working and nobody noticed until traffic fell.

The cost comparison

One more piece of arithmetic before you decide, because the headline prices are misleading in both directions.

A thirty-dollar tool at sixty published pins a month is fifty cents a pin.

The same tool at ten pins a month is three dollars a pin — six times the cost for the same software.

Meanwhile a nine-dollar tool at sixty pins is fifteen cents.

So the question is never "is this tool expensive".

It is "is this tool expensive at my volume", and the answer changes completely depending on how much you actually publish.

There is a full breakdown in what schedulers really cost if you want to run your own numbers.

And the thing switching will not fix

Worth saying plainly, because people sometimes switch tools hoping for a growth story and get an invoice story instead.

Changing scheduler changes what you pay and how pleasant your Sunday afternoon is.

It does not change your reach, because Pinterest has no idea which tool published a pin and would not care if it did.

Reach comes from what you pin and how well it matches what people are searching for — which is keyword research, not scheduling, and it is what PinPinterest is built for.

Switch to save money and time.

Those are excellent reasons.

Just do not expect the queue to have an opinion about your traffic.

Pay less for the queue — then fill it with topics people search for

Next: the scheduler comparison, what the free options actually give you, and the weekly workflow to run once you have landed somewhere.

#tailwind alternative#pinterest scheduler#switching tools#scheduling
More in Scheduling8 other guides in this categorySee all
Mia Bennett
PinPinterest editorial team

Mia Bennett is the pen name the PinPinterest team writes under. Our guides share what we learn building a Pinterest analytics tool — no fluff, just what actually moves traffic.